Project · Search Process Diagram

project

hard

module project

Ship something real. Submit your work when you're done.

Brief

Diagram the full search process for one of your target pages and identify where it might break.

Deliverables

A visual or structured diagram showing the complete path from URL discovery through crawling, rendering, indexing, and ranking for one specific target page.
An annotated list of at least four potential failure points in that process (e.g., blocked by robots.txt, noindex tag, slow render time, low authority) with the current status of each for your chosen page.
A prioritized fix list: for each identified failure point that applies to your page, one concrete action to resolve it with an estimated effort level (hours/days/weeks).
A one-paragraph summary of the single highest-leverage intervention for this page and why you chose it over the others.

How we grade it

Diagram includes all five stages — discovery, crawl, render, index, rank — and correctly shows the dependencies between them.
Failure points are specific to the chosen page (verified via URL Inspection or server checks) rather than generic SEO advice.
Each fix in the prioritized list names a specific tool, tag, or configuration change — not vague guidance like 'improve content quality'.
Effort estimates are grounded in realistic time for the tasks described, not optimistic single-line estimates.

Hints

Choosing a target page: Pick a page that already gets some impressions in Search Console but ranks below position 10 — this gives you data to work with and a realistic gap to analyze.

Diagnosing the crawl stage: The URL Inspection tool in Search Console shows you the last crawl date, the user-agent used, and the rendered HTML Google saw. Compare that rendered HTML to your browser's view source to detect rendering failures.

Diagnosing the index stage: The same URL Inspection tool shows Google's indexing decision and the canonical URL Google selected — if it differs from your intended canonical, that is an indexing-layer problem, not a crawl problem.

Diagnosing the rank stage: If the page is indexed but ranks poorly, the failure is in relevance, authority, or experience signals — compare directly to the top three results using the framework from the Core Ranking Signals task.

Expected output

Target page: /blog/what-is-compound-interest

Process diagram: Discovery → Sitemap (submitted, no errors) → Crawl → Render (JavaScript delayed: 1.2s Googlebot render lag) → Index (indexed, canonical confirmed) → Rank (position 14, relevance strong, authority gap)

Failure points identified:

Render lag (1.2s): Googlebot may miss late-rendering FAQ section — Priority: High

Zero inbound internal links from high-equity pages — Priority: High

No author schema markup on page — Priority: Medium

No featured snippet formatting for the definition paragraph — Priority: Medium

Top intervention: Add three contextual internal links from high-traffic calculators that already rank on page 1 — estimated 2 hours, highest equity transfer with no engineering dependency.

Stretch goals

Extend the diagram to cover all five of your top target pages and identify which failure stage is most common across them — this tells you whether your SEO problem is systemic (e.g., a site-wide canonical issue) or page-specific.

Build a Search Console data export and calculate the average position delta between pages with and without author schema markup on your site.

Write a one-page crawl health checklist your team can run monthly without a paid SEO tool — using only Search Console, curl, and a free browser extension.