Pick a depth. Each prompt opens in your AI pre-loaded with the lesson. Click a row to preview the prompt.
Documentary is half the social-commerce ad spend in 2026 — talking-head testimonials, 'founder-tells-story,' day-in-the-life, and long-form brand-cause work. AI raises two questions it did not have to face before: should this ad look like it was shot on a real camera by a real crew, or should it announce its own generated nature? Both choices are valid; only the wrong one is costly. Getting this decision right up front saves a project from being trapped in uncanny-valley mid-production. Learn to read which choice a brief demands, and which craft techniques deliver each aesthetic.
Three documentary registers: (1) Vérité — handheld, natural light, grainy, on-the-fly — feels caught rather than planned. AI models do this badly unless prompted for 'shaky handheld 16mm film grain 400 ASA'; even then, motion tells. (2) Polished doc — controlled interviews, B-roll, cinematic colour. AI does B-roll well (landscape, macro, neighbourhood detail), struggles with the interview subject. (3) Stylised/own-the-fake — the ad is explicitly generated, leans into hyper-real, over-lit, impossible-camera moves. Brands that embrace this tell the truth about how they made the work and win trust. Brands that mimic real badly lose it.
# Documentary aesthetic decision matrix
Brief question Lean toward
----- -----
Brand is taking a political/social stance → Real (vérité). AI-generated feels hollow here.
Founder-origin story with archival → Hybrid: real founder + AI archival recreations (disclosed)
Explanatory product piece → Polished doc. AI B-roll is cheap and great here.
Abstract brand essay / poetic → Own-the-fake. Embrace the generated look.
Testimonial from real customers → REAL. Never generate customer faces. Full stop.
Tour of a facility or craft process → Polished doc + selective AI (cutaways, time-lapses)
"What if [brand] in 20 years?" → Own-the-fake. Generation is the point.
Ethical rule (non-negotiable):
If the viewer is being asked to trust a claim about reality (price, ingredient, result),
the footage backing that claim must be real. AI can illustrate. It cannot testify.